Nonprofits First
News & Press
Blog Home All Blogs

Public Support for Not-For-Profits: Practical Considerations and Protecting Public Charity Status

Posted By Andrew Gray, CPA, Thursday, September 8, 2016

As one of many items to consider when forming or maintaining a not-for-profit organization, public support is arguably one of the most important. Nevertheless, the issue's importance is often drastically underrated, and it is a common source of errors on exempt organization returns. The stakes are high because organizations that do not pass the public support test may be treated as private foundations.

Being a private foundation could be unattractive to donors and may not line up with the charity's operations and strategic direction. In addition, private foundations come with their own requirements, which often are more stringent and costly than those of a public charity. (On the other hand, in some cases, private foundation status may be the better choice and align more closely with the organization's goals.)

Given the consequences of mistakes in this area, it is critical that an organization's staff, board, and advisers know the organization's public support percentage, have an understanding of the special issues that affect the public support test, and learn how to maintain public support in practice and properly prepare Schedule A, Public Charity Status and Public Support, of Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax, to prove its public support to the IRS.

So how does an organization know its public support percentage?

Schedule A serves as the catalyst for the IRS's, the organization's, and the public's record of the public support test. Schedule A is used to indicate an organization's reason for public charity status and to provide the IRS with detailed information about the organization's funding sources. Generally, public support of more than 33⅓% must be maintained to preserve public charity status (Sec. 509(a)(2)(A)). Two exclusive tests exist to facilitate the calculation to determine an organization's public support percentage. These tests are reported on Schedule A, Part II, "Support Schedule for Organizations Described in Sections 170(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)," and Part III, "Support Schedule for Organizations Described in Section 509(a)(2)." (For more on how the public support percentage is calculated, see this article.)

Once the organization conceptually knows how to calculate the public support percentage, it should understand the special issues associated with the calculation and the practical considerations for preparing Schedule A.

Special issues and calculations

1. Unusual grants. Generally, unusual grants are donations an organization received that may be significantly large and uncommon. Unusual grants are excluded from the public support and total support definitions for both of the support tests. The criteria for determining whether a grant is unusual (Regs. Secs. 1.170A-9(f)(6)(ii) and 1.509(a)-3(c)(3)) are:

  1. A substantial contribution or bequest from a disinterested party;
  2. Attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization;
  3. Is unusual or unexpected in amount; and
  4. Would, by reason of its large amount, result in the organization's not meeting the applicable public support test.

An example of an unusual grant would be a bequest of $100 million from a disinterested party's estate to an animal shelter that has annual revenues of $20 million. If the organization recognizes revenue on an accrual basis, in the year of the bequest all of this money would be included on Form 990 as revenue, even if the cash is paid out over a number of years, or a certain percentage is paid each year.

In analyzing the criteria for an unusual grant, the contribution is substantial, unusual in amount, and would by reason of its amount result in the organization's not meeting the public support test. Assuming the donation was attracted by reason of the publicly supported nature of the organization, this would be considered an unusual grant. Therefore, for Schedule A purposes, the $100 million is excluded from both the numerator and the denominator, and the public support percentage likely remains similar to that of previous years.

2. Excess contributions. For the Sec. 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) test (Part I of Schedule A), excess contributions are not included in the numerator. Excess contributions are contributions by each person included on line 1 of Schedule A, Part II, that exceed 2% of total support for the five-year period (the amount shown on line 11, column (f)). "Each person" includes private foundations but excludes governmental units or publicly supported organizations. As an example, if an organization's total five-year support is $10 million, of any contributions from each person that exceed 2% of $10 million or $200,000 in total for the five-year period, only $200,000 is included in public support. Any amount above the $200,000 is not included in public support.

3. Disqualified persons. For the Sec. 509(a)(2) test, contributions from disqualified persons are not included in the numerator for the public support test. Sec. 4946 defines a disqualified person as:

  1. A substantial contributor, i.e., a person who gave an aggregate amount of more than $5,000 if that amount is more than 2% of the total contributions the organization received from its inception through the end of the year in which that person's contributions were received. A substantial contributor generally remains a substantial contributor even if he or she did not make any other contributions.
  2. A foundation manager.
  3. An owner of more than 20% of the voting power of a corporation, profits interest of a partnership, or beneficial interest of a trust or an unincorporated enterprise that is a substantial contributor (defined in item a) to the organization.
  4. A family member of an individual described in items a–c. A family member, for this purpose, is the donor's spouse, ancestors, children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, and the spouses of children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.
  5. A corporation, partnership, trust, or estate in which persons described in items a–d own more than 35% of the voting power, profits interest, or beneficial interest.

Note that the substantial contributor calculation is based on figures from the organization's inception, which in practice may be difficult information to obtain.

4. Becoming a private foundation. If the organization becomes a private foundation after failing the public support test and other tests, the organization should be aware of the result.

  1. The foundation would be subject to excise taxes of 1%–2% on net investment income.
  2. Contributions would be limited to 30% of the donors' adjusted gross income (AGI) on their personal income tax return rather than the 50% limit that applies to a public charity.
  3. Certain types of donations are deductible only to the extent of the donor's basis in the property instead of its fair market value.
  4. The foundation would be required to file Form 990-PF, Return of Private Foundation, rather than Form 990.
  5. The organization would be subject to the strict Chapter 42 rules:
    1. Prohibition on self-dealing with disqualified persons.
    2. 5% minimum distribution requirement.
    3. Limit on excess business holdings.
    4. Additional requirements on grant making to nonpublic charities and to individuals.

Conversely, there are benefits to becoming a private foundation:

  1. More control by a single entity or family is permitted;
  2. Public support is a nonissue, so fundraising is perhaps more flexible.

Follow these pointers for maintaining public charity status and preparing Schedule A.

1. An organization's IRS determination letter does not dictate under which test the organization must report. In general, determination letters contain the Code section under which an organization is described, such as, Sec. 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (Part II of Schedule A) or Sec. 509(a)(2) (Part III of Schedule A). Part I of Schedule A requests the organization's "Reason for Public Charity Status," but the organization is not required to select the option aligned with its IRS determination letter. In other words, the organization should select one of the options under which it could qualify as publicly supported during the tax year. In many cases, for public charities, this means line 7 (an organization that receives a substantial amount of support from the government or the general public) or 9 (an organization that receives 33⅓% support from membership fees, etc.) could be selected. In practice, the best choice may be to select the one providing the most favorable public support percentage.

2. Recognize the complexity and importance of the public support test. The calculation and its components are extremely complex and require the preparer to thoroughly read the applicable parts of the Form 990 and Schedule A instructions. In many cases, it will be necessary to do further research to properly prepare the form. Because of the difficulty in preparing the form, the likelihood the form will be completed improperly is extremely high. If an organization does not understand its public support percentage or improperly calculates it, the organization may become a private foundation and not be aware of it. Furthermore, the IRS monitors the vast majority of Form 990 data and further analyzes them to determine whether organizations are in compliance.

3. The information needed to prepare Schedule A requires detailed records such as:

  • Contributor data consistent with the organization's Form 990 accounting method. The accounting method required for Schedule A is the method the organization uses on Form 990. In many cases, this will be the accrual basis of accounting, which may lead to an inconsistency with donor data that may be reported internally on the cash basis for written acknowledgement purposes. Because individual donors are typically cash-basis taxpayers, they require written acknowledgments that reflect the cash basis. Therefore, it is possible that a cash-to-accrual conversion of the data will be needed to properly prepare the form.
  • Detailed information regarding the organization's revenue sources. Because Schedule A's two exclusive tests require different information and certain types of revenue, it is critical that there is an understanding of the revenue sources—for example, whether the revenue was exempt function income, donations, or unrelated business income.
  • Historical contributor data. Organizations should maintain detailed contributor data from inception and particularly for the five-year period associated with the public support test. Further, the organization should also maintain data about disqualified persons and excessive contributors.

4. Public charity status is attractive to donors. Public charities are the most attractive to donors for several reasons. First, the publicly supported nature of the organization means the donor joins a vast number of others who have contributed. Additionally, the tax deduction available to donors is limited to 50% of the donor's AGI, rather than 30% of AGI for donations to private foundations. When a donor sees that the organization is funded by a smaller group of wealthy individuals or foundations, the donor may be reluctant to support the cause when large foundations or wealthy individuals have contributed so significantly.

5. Monitor public support regularly in the first five years of existence or if the organization is in jeopardy of losing its public charity status. It is important for new organizations to understand and know the public support percentage even though organizations are not required to report the percentage during the first five years of existence. As an example, many organizations may be funded by a select group of individuals in the early days and become more publicly supported in future years. If the organization isn't careful, the sixth year of existence may come with a surprise that the organization does not meet the public support test. Additionally, advisers should consider monitoring an organization's public support if it comes into question. This could provide the organization with the information it needs to make key support decisions or to give it ample preparation time prior to becoming a private foundation.

6. Understand that certain records used in preparing Schedule A are not open to public disclosure. Many tax software programs will generate schedules that are not open to public disclosure, such as the unusual grants list, the excess contributor list, and the disqualified persons list. It is critical that organizations and their advisers produce full public disclosure copies  to provide copies to stakeholders or publish on the organization's website.

Organizations should consult with their advisers to ensure the public support test calculation is accurate, addresses the special issues, and reflects the organization's broad public support.

Andrew Gray, CPA, is a tax adviser at Daszkal Bolton in Jupiter, Fla. who specializes in tax consulting and compliance for public charities and private foundations. He often speaks about Form 990, Form 990-PF, unrelated business income, and public support. Andrew is also the Board Chair of Nonprofits First.

Original post can be found here.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Susan Buza, longtime 211 HelpLine leader, retires

Posted By Josh Hirsch, Tuesday, September 6, 2016

After an 18-year tenure, Susan Buza has retired as the President/CEO of 211 Palm Beach/Treasure Coast.

In 1998, Buza stepped into what she thought would be a temporary role. It quickly became a long-term career venture for her. The agency is a nonprofit organization that provides crisis intervention, suicide prevention, information, assessment and referral to community services, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year .

Buza led 211 through many achievements. The agency has become nationally accredited by the Alliance of Information and Referral Services (the first in Florida and the fifth in the nation); received national certification from the American Association of Suicidology and Contact USA; become accessible by dialing the three digit number 2-1-1; changed its name from The Center of Information and Crisis Services to 211 Palm Beach/Treasure Coast; realized a tripling of its annual budget by broadening its income sources; increased its service area from one county to five; added four specialized services (Special Needs HelpLine, PBC Victim Services Hotline, Healthcare Advocacy and Help Me Grow); and continued to be recognized as a critical service.

“It has been extremely rewarding to see how 211 has grown over the past several years and how we have become such an integral part of the service delivery system in our region,” Buza said. “I cherish all of the relationships I have built over my tenure with 211 and I thank everyone who has played a role in our success.”

The agency has planned its annual fall event in Buza’s honor. “Cocktails & Croquet” will be Oct. 14 at the National Croquet Center and will include dinner, drinks, entertainment and a silent auction, for $150 per person. The evening will shine a light on and pay tribute to all that Susan has accomplished throughout her career, as well as introduce 211 HelpLine’s new President/CEO, Sharon L’Herrou.

For more information about the event, call 561-383-1128 or visit 211’s website at

Original post can be found here.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Clinics Can Help Set To Move in To Newly Expanded Facility October 1

Posted By Josh Hirsch, Friday, September 2, 2016

October 1 is the official move date for Clinics Can Help (CCH), the West Palm Beach based nonprofit helping those in Palm Beach County with improved healthcare through the provision of medical equipment and supplies. Following its July 12 groundbreaking on National Disability Awareness Day, the nationally recognized nonprofit is excited to offer more benefits for its clients’ medical needs through its expanded facilities.

The expansion includes 5,000 sq. ft. of office space, as well as a significantly larger warehouse which will help the organization meet the growing needs of children and adults across the county access vital medical equipment. CCH has become the answer for many families and individuals who are unable to attain the wheelchairs, walkers, hospital beds and other necessary medical equipment needed to improve, or to simply manage, their lives.

During the past decade, CCH has become locally and nationally recognized for its innovative programs such as the Lending Closet, which matches those in medical and financial need with donated items.  Response has been overwhelming for CCH’s KINDER (Kids In Need of Durable Equipment Right now) Project, which seeks and provides special adaptive strollers, wheelchairs and other equipment for children with serious medical conditions.  

 “We have been able to provide more than $820,000 in reusable medical supplies and equipment last year alone,” said CCH Founder and President Owen O’Neill. “Thanks to generous donations of equipment and funds, we are able to provide hundreds of wheelchairs, hospital beds, walkers, and wound care supplies to children and adults throughout our area.” O’Neill anticipates the new space will allow the organization to reach four times as many clients through the expanded warehouse and administrative facilities.

About Clinics Can Help:

CCH is a vital resource in Palm Beach County and throughout southeast Florida for families in search of medical equipment such as hospital beds, wheelchairs, nebulizers and walkers.  Access to this equipment is a critical part of acquiring quality health care and for the thousands of children and adults who cannot afford it.  CCH makes a difference in the lives of through a simple process of organized recycling. It is the only organization of its kind in Florida and one of only four in the U.S. that provides a vast and diverse array of equipment.

For more information about Clinics Can Help or this groundbreaking event please visit or call 561-640-2995.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Nonprofit brings new life to old neighborhood

Posted By Josh Hirsch, Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Habitat for Humanity of Palm Beach County is celebrating 30 years of helping deserving local people become homeowners.

In the past 30 years, the chapter has built 205 new homes. Now, it's focusing especially on one area of West Palm Beach.

Friday, Habitat for Humanity dedicated its tenth home in Coleman Park, a historic neighborhood in the northern part of West Palm Beach.

Many of the homes in Coleman Park have fallen into disrepair in recent years. To change that, the city has been donating empty lots on which Habitat for Humanity can build. The non-profit also repairs current homes in the neighborhood.

"Some of them need new roofs, some of them need electrical work done, some, significant work in order for their home to be safe," said Bernard Godek, CEO of Habitat for Humanity of Palm Beach County. "So we've been helping those families too."

"It's changing a street that might have boarded up houses that are rehabbed by Habitat, or vacant lots that are built on," said West Palm Beach city commissioner Sylvia Moffett.

In addition to the ten new homes already built in Coleman Park, the group has many more in the area on its construction schedule.

"It lowers crime because you have more people," Moffett said. "More eyes on the street, more people invested."

"There's a lot more spirit going on, a lot more pride in ownership and living in this community," Godek said. "It's just exciting to see the change."

Original post can be found here.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Communities in Schools of Palm Beach County receives $25,000 donation from AT&T

Posted By Josh Hirsch, Monday, August 29, 2016

AT&T is making a $25,000 contribution to Communities in Schools of Palm Beach County.

The nonprofit is dedicated to empowering students to stay in school and achieve in life.

The donation will be used to provide school-based graduation coaches for students at low-performing schools. The coaches will assist students with academic, attendance, and/or behavior issues by connecting them and their families with critical community resources.

The $25,000 is part of AT&T Aspire, AT&T’s signature education initiative focused on high school success and career readiness. In addition to providing financial support to CIS, AT&T employees spend time each year at a school sharing job readiness activities with high school students.

Original post can be found here.

This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
Page 36 of 40
 |<   <<   <  31  |  32  |  33  |  34  |  35  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  40

Association Management Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal